Authors

Discussion

In modern studies (usually Western ones), due to the globalization processes taking place in the world, a direct connection between language, culture and territory is increasingly not made (see, for example, [Lafontant, 1995]). In our opinion, it would be an oversimplification to assume that French/Russian political leaders have the same qualities (including communicative ones) solely because they belong to the same ethnic group. We proceed from the fact that “each linguistic personality selects and “appropriates” precisely those linguistic means that reflect its vital dominant” [Karaulov, 2010. Pp. 52–53], i.e. we are interested not so much in the linguacultural aspect as in the individual speech aspect associated with the cognitive and pragmatic attitudes of the individual. We believe that the study of the features of individual linguistic personality that are reflected in language, the study of their individual characteristics, will allow us to draw general conclusions.