Thu4 Apr12:00pm(15 mins)
|
Where:
Lecture theatre 1
Track:
Speaker:
|
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) aims to eliminate schistosomiasis as a public-health problem by 2030. However, standard morbidity measures poorly correlate to infection intensities, hindering disease monitoring and evaluation. This is exacerbated by a lack of evidence on Schistosoma’s impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which means that comparisons of infections and interventions across health issues cannot currently be performed.
Methods: We conducted community-based cross-sectional surveys and parasitological examinations in moderate and high Schistosoma mansoni-endemicity communities in Uganda. We calculated parasitic infections and used the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-Y instrument to estimate and compare HRQoL utilities in these populations. We further employed Tobit and linear regression models to predict HRQoL determinants.
Results: Two thirds of the 560 participants were diagnosed with parasitic infection(s), with 49% having S. mansoni. No significant negative association between HRQoL and S. mansoni-infection status/intensity was observed. However, severity of pain urinating (b=-0.106;SE=0.043) and body swelling (b=-0.326;SE=0.005), increasing age (b=-0.016;SE=0.033), reduced socio-economic status (b=0.128;SE=0.032), and being unemployed were associated with lower short-term HRQoL.
Conclusions: Schistosomiasis associated symptom severity and socio-economic status were better predictors of short-term HRQoL than current S. mansoni-infection status/intensity. This is key to disentangling the link between infection(s) and short-term health outcomes, and highlights the complexity of correlating current infection(s) with long-term morbidity. Evidence is needed on the longer term HRQoL, health and economic outcomes associated with schistosomiasis interventions in order to inform the economic case for upfront investments in schistosomiasis interventions.