The paper examines the newspaper coverage of migration from Middle Eastern countries to Poland and the European Union in 2015 and 2021. The case study explains how the liberal-democratic Polish newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza framed the 2015 refugee crisis from the Middle East and the 2021 border dispute between Poland and Belarus in its online and in-print archived publications. The study traces the evolution of Gazeta Wyborcza`s migration framing using a mixed-method research design. The frame analysis based on Entman (1993) and Snow and Benford (1988) supplements the R-based unigram and bigram analysis.
The study connects media and migration studies. It reveals the predominance of humanitarian refugee framing and guest immigration framing in the newspaper`s discursive constructions. The literature review and empirical testing underline the guest perspective on asylum-seeking in the Polish debate, bridging humanitarian view on refuge-seeking and state security discourses. The interconnectedness of media and social frames favours functional replication of other actors` discursive constructions, increasing Gazeta Wyborcza`s reporting neutrality. Meanwhile, the paper also uncovers discrepancies in immigration coverage stemming from territorial proximity and crisis responsibility attribution: while the 2015 crisis coverage focused on war-led emigration from the country of origin, the 2021 border crisis description prioritised the hybrid warfare of Belarus against Poland.